EU Mandatory Disclosure Rules for Intermediaries (“DAC 6”)

On 25 June 2018, the Council of the European Union formally adopted new mandatory disclosure rules (“MDRs”) for qualifying intermediaries and relevant taxpayers, the latest in a series of EU initiatives in the field of automatic exchange of information in tax matters. The new rules will require financial intermediaries (incl. banks) and, in certain circumstances, relevant taxpayers, to disclose certain information on reportable cross-border tax arrangements if the arrangement meets one or more so-called hallmarks, i.e. certain criteria that are seen to present an indication of a potential risk of tax avoidance. Although the rules will only apply in the EU, there are various ways in which Swiss banks, trust companies, asset managers and financial services providers can be affected too. They should therefore carefully analyze the potential impact the new rules may have on their organization and determine appropriate steps to meet their potential obligations.

1.   Overview

As of 1 July 2020, qualifying intermediaries (or, in certain cases, the relevant taxpayer) will be required to disclose information on reportable cross-border tax arrangements to their authorities within 30 days of the earlier of when the arrangement is made ‘available for implementation’, ‘ready for implementation‘ or actually implemented.

Arrangements entered into after the Directive has entered into force on 25 June 2018 will also have to be disclosed as part of a delayed reporting requirement by 31 August 2020.

2.   Which taxes will be covered by DAC 6?

The scope of DAC 6 includes all taxes levied by (or on behalf of) a Member State, with the exception of VAT, customs duties, excise duties and compulsory social contributions. It therefore includes corporate and personal income taxes, inheritance and gift taxes, financial transaction taxes, stamp duties and insurance taxes. The Directive further requires reporting of cross-border arrangements which may have the effect of undermining the reporting of financial account information and those that aim to make beneficial owners unidentifiable.

3.   Which transactions will be affected by DAC 6?

DAC 6 will cover all arrangements that are cross-border, i.e. that involve participants resident in either more than one EU member state or a member state and a third country. The arrangement must further meet one or more of a set of hallmarks, i.e. certain features that are considered to present an indication of a potential risk of tax avoidance. Certain hallmarks further require that the so-called main benefit test is satisfied, i.e. that one of the main objectives of the arrangement is to obtain a tax advantage.

The hallmarks are structured into the following categories:

  • Category A – Generic hallmarks linked to the main benefit test: arrangements that give rise to performance fees linked to a tax advantage or involve mass-marketed tax optimization
  • Category B – Specific hallmarks linked to the main benefit test: this includes certain tax planning features, such as buying a loss-making company to exploit its losses in order to reduce tax liability. Another example would involve arrangements aimed at converting income into capital in order to obtain a tax benefit.
  • Category C – Specific hallmarks related to cross-border transactions; some of these hallmarks are also subject to the main benefit test: for example, deductible cross- border payments between associated enterprises where the recipient is essentially subject to no tax, zero or almost zero Another hallmark is about deductions for the same depreciation on an asset claimed in more than one jurisdiction.
  • Category D – Specific hallmarks concerning the automatic exchange of information and beneficial ownership: an arrangement is reportable if it has the effect of undermining the rules on anti-money-laundering, transparency of beneficial ownership or the automatic exchange of information.
  • Category E – Specific hallmarks concerning transfer pricing: these include the use of unilateral safe harbours, and the transfer of hard-to-value intangible assets when no reliable comparables exist and the projection of future cash flows or income are highly

4.  Who is required to report?

The primary reporting obligation under DAC 6 lies with the intermediary. An intermediary is defined as any person that designs, markets, organises or makes available for implementation or manages the implementation of a reportable cross-border arrangement. The term also includes any person undertaking to provide, directly or by means of other persons, aid, assistance or advice in relation to the above.

In the following cases the reporting obligation shifts to the taxpayer:

  • The intermediary is exempt by virtue of legal professional privilege;
  • There is no intermediary; or
  • The intermediary is located outside of the EU.

5.  What information will need to be reported?

The following information will need to be reported under DAC 6:

  1. Identification of the taxpayers and intermediaries involved,
  2. Details of the hallmarks that generated the reporting obligation,
  3. A summary of the arrangement,
  4. The date of the first step in implementing the reportable arrangement,
  5. Details of the relevant domestic tax rules,
  6. The value of the arrangement,
  7. The identification of the member state of the relevant taxpayer(s) and any other member states which are likely to be concerned by the reportable cross-border arrangement,
  8. The identification of any other person in a member state likely to be affected by the reportable cross-border arrangement, indicating the corresponding member

6.  How will Swiss banks be affected?

While DAC 6 will only apply within the EU, it is nevertheless important for Swiss banks to analyse how they can potentially be affected by the rules. Swiss intermediaries should in particular analyse the following key areas of implications:

  • Swiss banks with EU resident clients will, at a minimum, need to inform their EU resident clients about their potential reporting obligations. Given the wide definition of the term “intermediary”, this will comprise cross-border arrangements offered by Swiss banks themselves as well as situations where a Swiss bank acts as an advisor with regards to arrangements offered by third
  • Swiss banks with related entities in the EU will need to analyse whether the services offered to clients by those entities are potentially reportable;
  • Swiss banks with related entities in the EU will further need to analyse potential reporting obligations resulting from transactions within the group.

 

Cyprus imposes 0.4% levy on sales of immovable property

The House of Representatives passed earlier this month a new law levying a 0.4% tax on all sales of immovable property, the proceeds of which will go toward supporting Greek-Cypriot refugees.

The law was published in the official Government Gazette on 22 February 2021.

The legislative proposal, passed by a unanimous vote in the plenum, aims to compensate refugees for their inability to possess, have access to, or otherwise gainfully use their land due to the Turkish invasion and occupation of the northern third of the island in 1974.

It provides for a levy on any sale/transfer of real estate, as well as on the transfer of shares in a company where that company owns immovable property or where the transfer of the shares results in the buyer taking control of the company or exploiting the immovable property in question.

The levy is payable by the seller of the property.

The funds raised will go into a fund managed by the Central Agency for the Equal Distribution of Burdens, the state agency tasked with assisting refugees of the 1974 war

Implementation of the Ultimate Beneficial Owner (UBO) Register of Companies and Other Legal Entities in Cyprus

We would like to inform you that Cyprus has recently proceeded with the full transposition of the 4th European Directive (EU 2015/849) of the European Parliament (4th AML Directive) into domestic law and activated the implementation of the Ultimate Beneficial Owner (UBO) Register of Companies and other legal entities in Cyprus.

On 16 December 2020, the Council of Ministers of Cyprus has resolved to:

  • appoint the Registrar of Companies (RoC) and Official Receiver of the Ministry of Energy, Trade, and Industry, as the competent authority for the maintenance of the central Register of UBO of companies and other legal entities and
  • authorise the RoC and Official Receiver, to collect information about the UBOs of companies and other legal entities through the intermediate system solution that has been

Read More